When I started out freelancing, I thought all editors had gone crazy. They kept taking my stories (not the crazy bit), but giving me a tighter word count than I knew (yes, knew, from the bottom of my inexperienced writerly heart) the story required. Did they all go to a secret school where the curriculum skipped the bit about figuring out how long a story really should be?
“800w? Impossible. I need 1000w.”
“1000w? Ridiculous. I need 1400w.”
Sometimes, I was right. Occasionally, an editor didn’t initially grasp how utterly important my story was and how it really, really deserved a larger word count. But after a while, I realised every editor did the same thing.
You know where this is going right? When everyone else seems crazy…maybe the problem is you? I eventually realised I would never think I was being given enough words (and no, not just because I’m paid by the word), but because I hadn’t grasped the concept of tight writing.
While tight writing (making every word work hard) is a skill that can be learned, even the best writers slip up now and then. As her tweet below shows, Helen Razer fought the word count demons (and lost) last week.
Add 300 words to an unstructured feature already 3 weeks overdue and about 1800 words over-limit hours before print? DON'T MIND IF I DO.
— Helen Razer (@HelenRazer) May 17, 2013
When a well meaning follower said, “Well, at least you tried, that’s what matters,” Helen responded: “No, no, that’s not what matters!” Because as a professional, Helen knows, it’s not trying to be on word count that matters. It’s being on word count (or you know, plus or minus about five per cent).
@call_me_tomasso thanks for the advice, hon but this is for the actual newspaper. ALso, word limits remain a thing in pro media. Thank fuck
— Helen Razer (@HelenRazer) May 17, 2013
Luckily, Helen Razor can get away with it. But most of us can’t. Unless you have a similarly high profile, or are a subject matter expert with such a unique perspective that no-one but you can tell your particular story, don’t put your editor through the pain of filing a story way over word count. He or she will not be as accommodating at Helen’s editor was!
So, how do you stop blowing your word count?
1. “Kill your darlings, kill your darlings, Kill your darlings.”
Stephen King said it (although from a lazy Google search it seems that Sir Arthur Quiller-Couch coined it), and almost every professional writer knows it. You love the beautifully crafted words you’ve spent hours labouring over. But kill them. That’s right. Cut, cut, cut. Don’t worry; it hurts less the more often you do it. If you can’t bring yourself to do it, try it on a day you’re in a really bad mood (also a good day to clean out your wardrobe, I’ve found).
2. Be ruthless.
Look at each line of your piece and ask yourself, “Is that the most interesting, engaging and efficient way of making this particular point?” You don’t just want a story filled with boring facts with no colour. But neither do you want fluff. Editors hate fluff. Readers hate fluff. Get rid of it.
3. Stop the problem at the source.
I mostly manage to avoid this whole problem in the first place by planning my stories out in advance. If I sit at the computer without a clear story plan, of course I’ll overwrite. I’ll include too much about my subject’s tennis career and not enough about his or her family life. Or, I’ll be so engrossed in the description of a start up’s early days, that I’ll realise I’ve run out of room to describe the company’s future plans.
Believe me. Cutting back a story that is overwritten is boring and frankly, painful. I know, it’s not ‘creative’ sounding to plan out your stories. But it’s smart. And it works. And if you’re writing for a format like a newspaper or a magazine, where the structure is pretty much set in stone, there’s nothing creative about writing 2000w and then spending four hours chopping them back to 800w. Unless you find creativity in figuring out how many different ways you can bash your head on the keyboard asking,”Why?”
Try it. And let me know how you go in the comments, or if you prefer, on Twitter (@suewhitewriter). The perfect place to practice concise writing!
0
0
0
Great piece Sue. For me, i try to stay within 400-500 words of the count (not TOO much to slash back, then), and if deadline permits, leave the piece overnight or even better, for two days before I go back to it. So much easier to slash redundant lines I may have been really in love with before.
And if there’s no time, I send it to one or two fellow freelance friends and beg them to be ruthless 🙂
Thanks Rachel! 400-500w still does my head in, but that’s because most of the pieces I’m working on at the moment around 800-1200w. So more than 200w over and I’m cranky 🙂 Totally agree on leaving things overnight or longer – that always pays off. The red pen of other freelancers sounds good – hadn’t thought of that. Might be the end of a lovely friendship if goes wrong though?
Hehe, yes. Luckily no dramas so far!
I guess we have almost an unspoken rule that you can’t be precious about anything you hand over … and usually we’re all on deadline and freaking out, so we just want it to be the best it can be so we can file it 🙂
Great unspoken rule. Precious not very useful anyway – if we want someone to love it that’s what grandmothers are for 🙂
Hi Sue, Such a good post for this point in my week – am days off filing a story so it’s slash and burn time. I actually re-read a story I filed for this same editor some months back, and realised that they had cut out most of my “colour” to make way for info boxes etc…Should I be upset? Or is this the norm?
Hmmm. Tricky. I usually send my story off with a kiss (okay, an Om) and then not stress about what happens to it. But that’s because I’ve realised getting upset about it doesn’t help me. It’s not the norm – ie: most editors will not want to radically change a story – but it does happen. I’d be asking myself ‘did I do every single possible thing to meet house style?” ie: If they always use boxes, did I allow for that? Did I go over word count? etc. If I’d met all those parameters then I’d probably have a quiet grumble to myself and move on. If not, I’d make sure I amended for next time.